Fact-checking my own story

It's a little disconcerting to open the newspaper on Monday morning and find your photo and a half-page of newsprint about yourself at the top of the front page of section two.

It wasn't a surprise, of course; Jimmy Patterson conducted the interview more than a week ago and told me when the article would appear. But there's a big jump between a conversation over the phone, supplemented by a couple of emails, and seeing the results in black and white.

Jimmy does a great job of profiling local residents in his weekly "Person to Person" column, although he's sometimes handicapped by the material he has to work with...me being Exhibit A. I wouldn't want his job (or this aspect of it...this isn't how he makes his living). Trying to paint an accurate and coherent picture of a person based on an hour of conversation is just too much pressure. There's too much room for displeasure when the primary fact-checkers are those who know the interviewee the best. But Jimmy seems to thrive in that environment, and does an excellent job of bringing order out of chaos. In my case, I'm happy with the end result.

But, as he alluded in his article, we're entering a new world of journalism, one where news reports (both hard and soft) are no longer one-way streets. Every article is now a potential discussion, and the subjects of those articles have avenues of response, if not outright rebuttal. Being a blogger himself, Jimmy necessarily understands that fact, and so he won't be surprised that I'm going to do a little "fact-checking" myself, as there were a couple of misstatements and one area that I feel needs clarification. These things aren't significant and won't even be noticed by most readers; they also aren't necessarily the writer's fault, as I suspect that interviewing me is like herding cats.

First, my academic creds are a bit different than described. My undergrad degree is in accounting and my M.S. is in behavioral management. I point that out only to ward off any requests for help with tax returns; it's been a long time since I did any real accounting (and I never worked in tax accounting).

Second, the timing of my descent into the surreal world of web design is a little misleading as described in the article. I actually built my first web page in 1996, and it was shortly thereafter that I built the website for First Baptist Church. For three or four years, I provided website design and maintenance services on a completely pro bono basis to a wide variety of organizations, and I started doing it commercially only in 2000 after leaving ARCO. In fact, of the clients mentioned in the article, I still provide all services at no cost to the church, the Permian Basin Area Foundation, the Nonprofit Management Center (mentioned in the article as the "Non-Profit Resource Center") and Keep Midland Beautiful (and several others that were not mentioned).

The one area that I do want to be sure to clarify was where Jimmy wrote about my faith, and included this rather cryptic statement: He said his born again status was due probably to the time when he wasn't -- born again, that is. He then goes on to describe a period in my life when I felt I wasn't living out my faith.

One possible reading of this section could lead one to believe that I said that I was saved, then not saved, then saved again. While I realize that some Christians believe that it's possible to lose one's salvation, my interpretation of Scripture leads me to understand and embrace the doctrine of "once saved, always saved." Jesus clearly states that He will not lose any of those whom God has entrusted to Him, and that's a great comfort to me as someone who will never be good enough to earn my salvation...or to keep it, if it depends on how holy I can be.

Anyway, to some that might be soteriological nitpicking, but it's a very important distinction for me. What I meant to convey was that even though I was saved, and never had any doubts about it, I found myself living in a way that wasn't pleasing to God nor presenting a good example to those around me. I still struggle with that today, but through the grace of God and the encouragement of good friends and loving family, it gets easier.

[Update (2/14/05): The "360 journalism" continues...Jimmy Patterson just emailed me to say that his intent was to say exactly what I said above. He doesn't believe that people can fall from grace, once saved. So, we're just clarifying the words. But, isn't it cool that we're now able to have discussions like this in almost real time?]

All that aside, I think Jimmy did a fine job of profiling yours truly, and I think my parents will be proud of the article...and they're the ultimate critics we have to please, after all. I just hope he can now move on to someone worthy of the newsprint.

And if you're visiting for the dog pictures, Abbye says "welcome"!

Comments

Well, as implausible as it may sound, I noticed each of those little things you mentioned but chalked it up to the usual errors found in newspapers. (And no wonder, with the interviewer having only 1 hour's time with you!) I was satisfied [like it matters!] overall with the article but am now even more pleased that you were willing and able to clarify the issue of your security in your relationship with Jesus Christ, based on His trustworthiness rather than your merit. That's important for folks to understand.

Our household was happy that the gist of the article seemed to deliver a decent glimpse into your blogging life for those unfortunate enough not to have had the opportunity to visit the Gazette.

Have you had a surge in traffic this morning?

Posted by: jasmine at February 14, 2005 09:23 AM

So, Eric, any compensation coming your way from the folks at Blogger, in appreciation for product placement in the photo?

Posted by: Jeff at February 14, 2005 09:59 AM

Jasmine, I guess it depends on your definition of "surge." Traffic is about double the usual amount, which brings it up from a trickle to a dribble (those being technical blogging terms, of course). ;-)

Jeff, that hoodie was my "compensation" from Blogger. It was a freebie sent to all Blogger Pro customers when the company decided to provide all the features the Pro clients had been paying for to all its clients for free. I was going to wear my Fire Ant Gazette sweatshirt, but figured the Blogger one would photograph better.

Posted by: Eric at February 14, 2005 10:04 AM

Can I have your audi-graff, Mr. Siegmund??

Posted by: Sherry at February 14, 2005 10:15 AM

OK, I can see that this is going to garner me all the respect that I deserve.

Groupies. What are ya gonna do? ;-)

Posted by: Eric at February 14, 2005 10:21 AM

Good thing you distanced yourself quickly from that Weslyan stuff. ;-)

Posted by: bryan at February 14, 2005 11:43 AM

Yeah, I got a lot of Baptist readers!

Posted by: Eric at February 14, 2005 01:07 PM

Eric, Jimmy left out any mention of Ryan or Tour Easy recumbent bicycles. So to even things up here's a link to the "Bent Blog" with a quicktime movie of A 'Varna' in the Vancover area practicing for the "Jack Frost Time Trial".

I can only say that to my knowledge no injuries occured.

http://homepage.mac.com/john4bho/iblog/

See you on the road. Kent on a bent

PS Check out the new www.pbbaracing.com site...

Posted by: Kent at February 14, 2005 04:31 PM

Kent, I would rather have talked about 'bents than blogging; they're a lot more interesting! Thanks for the links...there are some radical recumbents on that first one. I don't think I'd like being that prone and close to the ground. I'd be afraid a Hummer would roll right over me and never even feel a bump!

Posted by: Eric at February 14, 2005 09:45 PM

Yea Eric !!!!!!! it's your 15 minutes..... Soak it up man.....

Posted by: shannon at February 15, 2005 07:43 AM

Eric, getting back to that photo ... why was it so small? Usually, "Person to Person" gets a quarter-page, full-color photo. Were they trying to save on all those "toxic" inks that had Wallace 'worried' ?

Or - taking my cue some of the posts one finds in the blogosphere - was it sign of disdain from us debauched tramps of the mainstream media, seeking to reassure themselves by, quiteliterally, dimisnishing a blogger? :-)

Posted by: Jeff at February 15, 2005 03:28 PM

Actually, Jeff, I guess it's been a while since you've seen me. That is a life-sized photo. Richard Matheson would be so proud.

Plus, I'm not sure the MRT readers could handle a more-detailed image.

[And, fwiw, I may end up doing a website for the photographer, who wants one for his portfolio.]

Posted by: Eric at February 15, 2005 03:42 PM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?