Exiting the Ecosystem
As far as I know, I'm the only person to have ever done what I've just done, which is adding a meta tag to an active blog's template that will result in that blog's delisting from The Blogosphere Ecosystem.
Don't get me wrong; the Ecosystem is still an interesting resource. The Gazette has been listed for almost three years and during that period the Ecosystem has grown from about 10,000 listings to over 21,000. We managed to claw our way into a seemingly inalterable state of upper mediocrity (which is the only inference I can take from being classified as a "Four-toed Gelatinous Mass with Partial Exoskeleton") in the top 20% of the list.
But, I've been increasingly cognizant of the fact that 21,000 blogs out of an estimated...10 million? 20 million? who knows?...is, frankly, not that big a deal. Especially when you consider that many of the new sites being added to the Ecosystem are pørn and other blatantly commercial sites. Of course, aside from the question of morality in the case of the former, there's nothing inherently wrong with blogs being set up for those purposes. I'm not a crusader for blogging purity, in terms of subject, structure...or anything else, for that matter. But, at some point, association with that list of sites ceases to become meaningful to me.
In any event, I find myself going to Technorati more and more often, for purposes both narcissistic and educational. I suppose that the Ecosystem and Technorati were never intended as competitors, but the latter's metadata just seems a lot more useful nowadays.
So, I bid adieu to the Ecosystem, while wishing it well. And 18,000+ other blogs get to move up a notch. No, that's OK; don't bother thanking me. It's just the way I am.
I took your suggestion to heart and added { br/} many times down the side. I'll just do a few every time I post until I don't need to any more lol.
Rach, it's a shame to have to do it that way, and I hope to figure out a real solution, but as long as it works for you I guess there's no harm done. It really shouldn't be that hard, huh?
But, then, we can say that about a lot of things in life, can't we? ;-)
Posted by: Eric at April 24, 2005 06:41 PMThat is true, we can say that about a lot of things!
As you said (re: the code), as long as it works...
Posted by: Rachel at April 24, 2005 07:59 PMThe ecosystem is still a good place to reference traffic rankings. I don't know of any of the others who track traffic. And really, linking patterns don't really show popularity like people think they do.
I've done two academic studies using the top traffic rankings from the ecosystem. Until they come up with something better to track traffic, that's my source.
But I haven't paid attention to the linking rankings in a while. I was a marauding marsupial for a while, but I've probably dropped considerably once I stopped worrying about who noticed and trying to climb.
Posted by: bryan at April 24, 2005 09:37 PMBryan, if you find value in it, by all means, use it. I'm not anti-ecosystem; it's just lost whatever relevancy it once had for my purposes.
Posted by: Eric at April 24, 2005 10:19 PM
Hey Eric,
I started ignoring the eco system when I couldn't get it to change to my new blog - I just wiped my hands and thought who cares?
In regards to my other little problem I seem to have fixed it. I took your suggestion to heart and added { br/} many times down the side. I'll just do a few every time I post until I don't need to any more lol.
Thanks again and hope your Sunday was a blessed one too :)
Posted by: Rachel at April 24, 2005 06:18 PM