OSM Debuts *yawn*
The much-hyped Pajamas Media portal, Open Source Media (OSM), debuted a couple of days ago, and I'm still trying to figure out why it's a big deal. OSM is intended to be a "portal to the blogosphere," somehow bringing us the best and brightest, the most up-to-date and relevant, the sharpest of the cutting-edge -- so as to save us the trouble of finding it on our own. Or, possibly, having to rely on the MSM to get our content.
The only part of the concept I really grasp is that the founders hope to make some money from the site by selling advertising. Otherwise, I haven't seen any content compelling enough to make me want to return on a frequent basis. I've got a newsreader, and I know how to use it. I don't need a "portal" where someone who isn't me tries to decide what I'm interested in...even if those "someones" are all A-listers in the blogosphere. Plus, their aggregations are just weird.
For example, under "USA News," today's top two headlines are "Gibbs' return showing capital gains for Redskins" and "Michigan State has been a danger zone for Top 10 teams." These are both sports stories...but the page on which they appear bill thems and the others as "Top 5 Recent Headlines in the US," (along with "Caring for your trees will sprout rewards for you," which is either a horticulture article or a fortune cookie reading).
Then there's the "bloggers' debate" appearing on the home page, which purports to be an enlightening discussion among four big-name bloggers (Austin Bay, Brad Friedman, Max Sawicky, "Sgt. Mom") about "Why We Fight." After the first few entries, I quit reading as it reminded me of a junior high chatroom, albeit with slightly more multi-syllable words while lacking the energy.
It's probably just me, but there are some things I'd rather do for myself. For now, almost everything OSM is trying to do falls into that category.
Technorati tag: Open Source Media
I fear that I sometimes suffer from "A-lister awe," figuring that those folks (and everyone, really) know more about everything than I do, and if what they do looks, well, less than perfect, it must be me.
I can't help thinking that in this case, however, the emperor really has no clothes.
Posted by: Eric at November 17, 2005 09:07 AMI guess it's all a matter of perspective. I don't know any of the names on the supposed A-list. What is the A-list anyway?
If OSM were an aggregator of some other names, like say, Siegmund, Neidlinger, Zalm, Educat... well then I might be interested. But I guess I already have that.
OTOH, there's Findory which I looked at when you mentioned it in a meme a while back. I've found some very interesting stuff that way.
Posted by: Jim at November 17, 2005 09:46 AMY'know, I attempted to do the same with the Christian blogosphere - but as a hobby.
Even so, I see these guys quickly building what some might later deem as a sort of blogspheric ghetto.
Provided their business model doesn't do'm in first.
Posted by: Mean Dean at November 17, 2005 10:39 AMJim, I guess each person defines their own "A-list," using their own criteria. Mine is found primarily -- but not exclusively -- in my "Neighborhood" blogroll. Hmm. None of the OSM bloggers made it. How odd.
Dean, I think your idea of a niche aggregator or portal has more appeal than one that attempts to cover the waterfront. For the latter, Google News and Technorati work just fine for me, along with the specific blogs I consider "go-to" sources for specific topics.
I wish OSM well...all they need to do is to score some bigtime advertisers like Coke or J&J, and given the increasing problems with advertising via traditional media, they may well do it. But all that does is make OSMers rich; it doesn't make them credible or winsome. They'll have to do that on their own, and they may find out that being part of OSM makes that harder.
Posted by: Eric at November 17, 2005 12:31 PMI had a long and pleasant phone conversation with Roger Simon when they first started getting serious about putting this together. Besides "making money" which is a good goal....Roger envisioned something somewhat like an AP or UPI for the print media where "blog journalists" from all over the globe could either submit stories to OSM or link them from their blogs. I think that he would still be one of his goals and would be a good service.
However, in this startup phase anyway, it looks more like just another blog where the big boys comment or pick apart stories generated by the MSM. In my opinion there is enough of that already. I'm interested in genuine original content.
Posted by: Wallace-Midland Texas at November 17, 2005 02:28 PMeach person defines their own "A-list," using their own criteria. Mine is found primarily -- but not exclusively -- in my "Neighborhood" blogroll
**honorific bow in your general direction** many thanks for including a Penn's Woodsian in your neighborhood.
Posted by: Jim at November 17, 2005 03:41 PMI have no idea what a "Penn's Woodsian" is, or I might have excluded you after all. ;-)
Posted by: Eric at November 17, 2005 04:32 PMOn the off chance you were being serious about that previous comment, I will enlighten you. Penn's Woods is the meaning of the name Pennsylvania, the commonwealth founded by Quaker celeb William Penn some time ago, my state of residence.
More likely you were just being your humorous Texas self.
Posted by: Jim at November 17, 2005 06:13 PMI know it sometimes seems like I know everything, but this is completely new to me.
One can learn a lot by hanging out with bloggers.
Extrapolating from my new-found knowledge, would I assume correctly that "Transylvania" means "Woods of Pontiac Sports Cars"?
Posted by: Eric at November 17, 2005 06:20 PMRIGHT! You get a smiley for the day :-)
Posted by: Jim at November 17, 2005 07:07 PM
I though it was just me.. that did not get it.. I feel much less like my VCR is flashing 12:00 now.. thanks!
Posted by: Delorumrex at November 17, 2005 09:00 AM