When Townshend speaks, people listen (if they can hear him)
This Associated Press story documenting Who guitarist Pete Townshend's warning about headphones and hearing loss doesn't do justice to the extensive column appearing on Townshend's website.
In an entry dated December 29, 2005 on "Pete's Diary," he gives some fascinating (and potentially disturbing) anecdotal evidence for the damage that listening to loud sounds via headphones can cause...and the practical implications -- especially for musicians -- that accompany that damage.
If you watch the movie currently playing on TowserTV (I write this on December 29th 2005), the Who performing at Irvine in August 2000, you will see John Entwistle attempt to play his grand bass solo on the song Five Fifteen. You may find yourself wondering why such a fluid, expressive and accomplished player should continually drift out of time with the drummer (Zak Starkey). It happened because John couldn't hear properly. John still gives an astounding display, but he rarely stayed in time in that solo.
Townshend isn't holding himself out as a medical expert, but his theory has to be given some credence, given his experience and his direct knowledge of others in the same boat. It's also supported by common sense. And his lukewarm assessment that iPod listeners "may be OK" is not designed to offer any encouragement or comfort.
I rarely use earbuds and I keep my headphone volume low enough that I can hear ambient sounds. Whether that's sufficient protection, only time will tell. But I know already that I'm missing some frequencies at the highest part of the range and those are non-recoverable. I wonder what the overall hearing ability of the affluent* population will be in 20 years. Given the number of joggers I encounter whose approach is signaled more loudly by the music coming over their headphones than by their footsteps or breathing, I'm not optimistic.
*Update: This probably doesn't read well and now that I think about it, it's probably not even accurate. Headphones/earbuds and loud music are accessible across the entire economic spectrum.
Technorati tags: Pete Townshend | Hearing Loss
A warning worth heeding.
The same effect was produced by firing M-16' M-14's .45 pistols, M-60 machine guns, .50 Cal. machine guns, 90mm recoiless rifles, M-72 light anti-tank weapons, 106 mm recoiless rifles..... right next to one's ears. Not to mention 100's of hours flying in Hueys and Chinook helicopters with the whining transmissions 3 ft. away.
All this produced tinnitus for me. A constant high pitched hissing that excludes me from hearing within that frequency. Luckily I don't care much for that frequency anyway.
Posted by: Wallace-Midland, Texas at January 4, 2006 09:46 AMBryan, I'm kind of surprised at your blasé reaction, especially knowing what an avid music fan you are. Since you don't indicate when you experienced your hearing loss, I'm wondering if it's a case of not knowing what you're missing. Personally, I think any loss of hearing is a huge deal. I've watched my dad's struggles with severe hearing loss over the past few years and it's something that no one should have to experience. I'm not saying it's life-or-death (although it could be in some situations), but it's also something worth avoiding if you have the option.
Wallace, I never shoot without hearing protectors. And I avoid Hueys like the plague. ;-)
Posted by: Eric at January 4, 2006 01:16 PMExcellent post, Eric. Sadly, It's information that's come a little late for me (and a lot of other people).
I was part of the Walkman generation. I thought headphones (and especially earbuds) were the greatest invention since sliced bread. My parents never had to tell me to "turn it down" because "it" was being blasted through a set of headphones. A real win-win situation.
...or so I thought.
I still use them (with much more moderation) because earbuds are the closest thing to pumping music straight into the brain.
One of my deepest hopes is to be around when science perfects a direct feed into the auditory nerve.
I'm not sure if the eardrum can tell whether the eardbud is being powered by a 25 year old Sony Walkman running on AAs, or this year's Apple running on its own internal power cell. Pete Townshend was probably trying to avoid getting sued by Apple (or having all his offerings mysteriously disappear from the ITMS).
Electronic music is a minor passion of mine so I think I can appreciate what Pete Townshend is talking about, though.
The sound is "purer" and the range of tones is more noticeable. The listener can fully detect any limitation in their sound system starting with the condition of the CD and ending up in the most vital component: their ears.
"But I know already that I'm missing some frequencies at the highest part of the range and those are non-recoverable."
The solution is easy, just turn the volume up. :D
J/K.
Posted by: Mr. Freen at January 4, 2006 07:01 PMMy father gives himself a weekly "hearing test" by starting at the top key of the piano and playing each note down until he can actually hear something. I'm amazed at how much of the higher notes he can not hear. The number of keys he has to play before he hears grows every year. Years of driving loud tractors have ruined his hearing.
I'm not an earphone wearer myself. I would be extremely upset to lose the ability to hear those high notes on the piano.
Posted by: Julie at January 4, 2006 08:45 PMMy hearing loss was caused by a growth of skin cells behind the eardrum that ate away at the bones until I began to experience some weird balance issues. A surgery removed the growth, but repairing the bones will require another - very expensive - surgery which I can't afford.
I can hear fine with the other ear, so that may explain the blase reaction. Of course, when it comes to music, I'm much more attuned to the words than any extremely high or low range musical notes. :-)
I'm much more concerned with my bad eyesight than the hearing.
Posted by: bryan at January 4, 2006 09:25 PMMr. Freen, I'm not sure I can point to a single cause for my [still minor] hearing loss, because I was never a Walkman-junkie and didn't do any large-bore shooting while growing up. It's probably just a cumulative thing that comes from living in a noisy society, with some genetic causes thrown in for good measure.
Julie, I would think that any hearing loss would be a musician's worst nightmare. I guess Beethoven did pretty well on the composing end of things, but I can't imagine that he enjoyed not being able to hear his own work. However, this quote attributed to one of his correspondents might give some insight as to how one could "make lemonade from the lemons of life":
"Nevertheless, I believe that even the greatest genius, when hearing someone else's compositions, subconsciously copies ideas. In your case that doesn't happen, because you have to create everything from within yourself."
Bryan, that's an age-old debate: which sense would you rather keep, given the choice: vision or hearing. I'd have to go for vision also. I hope I never have to make that choice.
Posted by: Eric at January 4, 2006 09:33 PMThis is going to sound terrible for a visual artist, but I would rather lose my sight than my hearing. I can't imagine not hearing some of my favorite beatiful music, or losing the ability to have the reaction to orchestra or classical pieces that I now have.
Of course, I'd rather not lose either.
Posted by: Julie at January 5, 2006 07:54 PM
As someone with diminished hearing in one ear anyway (because of a middle-ear growth that destroyed the trio of bones), I remain unfazed by this stuff. Perhaps it's a significant loss for Townsend. I suspect it won't be for most.
Posted by: bryan at January 4, 2006 09:43 AM