Whose Jesus?

Todd Agnew's song, My Jesus, is getting a lot of airplay on the Christian radio network K-LOVE, and it contains a few lines that just get all over me.

Those lines are found in the chorus:

Cause my Jesus would never be accepted in my church
The blood and dirt on His feet might stain the carpet
But He reached for the hurting and despises the proud
I think He'd prefer Beal St. to the stained glass crowd...

First, whenever I hear someone begin a sentence with the words "My Jesus," it raises a red flag, because what often follows would be better expressed as "Here's how I imbue Jesus with my stereotypes, biases, and preconceived notions." I'm not sure any of us have the right to define Jesus for ourselves. He is "I AM," the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, and while different aspects of His character and His attributes may take on different significance for different people (and that's just fine), nevertheless, He is Who He is.

...my Jesus would never be accepted in my church...

I'm tempted to ask Todd why he sticks with a church that adheres to such standards. I'm not saying that there aren't congregations who would turn away a dirty, bleeding visitor...but I surely haven't encountered any.

I think He'd prefer Beal St. to the stained glass crowd...

This is the most egregious (if that's not too strong an adjective) line, in that it's not even Scripturally accurate and comes perilously close to the church-bashing that's seems to be so in vogue nowadays. Help me out here if I've overlooked it, but I can't recall in the Bible where Jesus tells us which kind of sinners He prefers to be around.

Sure, Jesus did reserve His harshest condemnation for certain "church folk," but they were the leaders of the organized church -- Pharisees and Sadducees and scribes and such -- and their sins, the ones that Jesus just wouldn't stomach, were the complete rejection of Him as Messiah and of the power of the Holy Spirit, and of the active abuse of their positions of authority to lead the people away from the truth (or, more accurately, the Truth). The fact of the matter is that Jesus loves the Church, and His return will be motivated largely by that love.

Of course, I don't know for sure what Todd had in mind when he singled out "the stained glass crowd," but millions of God-fearing, Jesus-loving, ministry-minded Christians attend mainstream churches that have stained glass windows, and I'm pretty sure that they're no more repugnant to Jesus Christ than whoever it is that frequents the unspecified "Beal Street" (Google gives 37,300 results for the search term). Last time I checked, we had all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, and perhaps the only legitimate distinction between those on "Beal Street" and those in the "stained glass crowd" is that the latter already are the Bride of Christ and the former need His salvation. (Yeah, I know...not everyone in the church is saved, but everyone in the Church is, by definition.)

I'll close with an admission that song lyrics probably shouldn't be examined this closely, because the poetic license that accompanies them often leaves them open to interpretations far afield from what the author had in mind. And I don't question Todd's sincerity or the purity of his motivations. I'll leave it to you, gentle reader, to decide how to react to these issues. If anything Todd or I has written causes you to think about "your Jesus" and "your church," then this will be worthwhile.

The mike is open.

Comments

I question song lyrics this closely. I don't know that I've heard this song yet or I'd be in the same swivet you are. (Swivet may be an exaggeration, it's the word that came to mind.)

I have to say I generally agree with everything you've said (though again, I haven't heard this song.)

The one that gets my blood boiling is Phillips, Craig & Dean's "I am a friend of God" song that our CCM station seems to play incessantly. Just so wrong on so many levels. Certainly we have a friend in Jesus - and what a friend He is! But no matter how we try, we'll never be able to be a friend back - He's our Master, Savior, Lord and King. And yes, our friend. But we are His children - His ill behaved, grace-needing children at that, the ones who hardly listen, rarely obey, and remain in the constant state of the terrible twos, our main words being "Me", "Mine" and "I do it". We're not His friend.

Posted by: beth at May 19, 2006 04:18 PM

The one that gets my blood boiling is Phillips, Craig & Dean's "I am a friend of God"

Now, see...that's an interesting example of how we each have different interpretations of "poetic license," because I just don't react the same way to that song. As I recall, the lyric is "I am a friend OF God," and not "I am a friend TO God," and that seems to be an important distinction. The song goes on to say "He calls me 'friend'", which, to me, is God reaching out (as usual) to give me status that I don't otherwise deserve.

While the "God as friend" picture escapes me from a Scriptural reference perspective (help me out), He certainly has all the characteristics I'd like to use when choosing a friend (as you point out).

Maybe this is all semantics. But it does make for interesting discussion. And it affirms my decision not to be a professional lyricist. ;-)

Posted by: Eric at May 19, 2006 04:40 PM

The song loses me at the title.

Posted by: Jim at May 19, 2006 04:59 PM

Here, I'll offer a different perspective. I don't think I've heard this song, and I agree with most everything you said. But I read those lyrics (without any other context, aside from the title, which I don't like) as making a statement about pride...about people who attend the nice big church building (not Church, with a capital "C") with the pretty stained glass windows but forget why they are there at all. People who are more worried about stains on the carpet than welcoming Jesus into their hearts.

Posted by: Gwynne at May 19, 2006 05:34 PM

Oh, yeah, Gwynne, I have no doubt that's what the songwriter had in mind with those lyrics. And I'm certainly not arguing that my interpretation is superior to any others. My point is simply that hypocrisy is no more (or less) of a sin than, say, prostitution or drunkeness or lewdness or whatever goes on on Beal Street to get it included in this song, and to imply that Jesus had rather hang out with the latter sinners than the former is just a stretch, to my way of thinking.

However, to concede your point, the damage done to the effectiveness of the Kingdom by us when we claim to be followers of Christ but don't live that way is, in my opinion, just devastating. And from the perspective that to whom much is given, much is expected, our responsibility is greater.

Posted by: Eric at May 19, 2006 05:53 PM

Amen. :-)

Posted by: Gwynne at May 19, 2006 06:16 PM

I like what the song has to say -- it asks some good questions. I agree the "holier than thou" tone (literally!) is a little off-putting.

I like the song's message, even if there might be a better way to deliver it.

Posted by: Brian at May 19, 2006 07:07 PM

Did anyone ever tell you it's dangerous to hand the mike over to a writer-type?

My interpretation of the "stained glass crowd" in the song is that it's the songwriter's attempt at drawing a parallel between those "Pharisees and Sadducees and scribes and such" you mention in your post. And, yes, I think it's a valid parallel. There are those type of religious zealots that walk among us even today. That's where our discernment comes into play and becomes so important. It's something we should pray for on a regular basis in this day and time.

As for the church---ain't gonna be meeting God inside any four walls unless I bring Him there with me.
As for The Church---isn't it refreshing that our worship can happen alongside other believers inside any four walls we choose....or not?

One vote FOR on this song....IMHO.

Posted by: Sherry at May 19, 2006 08:00 PM

My wife and I went to Beale St. two years ago and it was loads of fun. Music EVERYWHERE, old men playing trumpets at every restaurant, it was alive with a good time. IN FACT, I think I saw someone there who looked like ... naah ... but make no mistake ... this guy's talking about Beale St. in Memphis. Where you walk 10 feet off of "Beale". So yeah, he's gotta be talkin' Memphis.

Posted by: Jimmy at May 19, 2006 10:32 PM

Sorry, I've been out dancing my Baptist feet off.

Anyway, where were we?

I got no beef with anyone else's interpretation of these lyrics, and I appreciate everyone's willingness to share their views about them.

Jimmy, you're probably right about the song referring to Memphis. According to his website, Todd now lives in Memphis (although he's originally from Texas). He also looks much younger than his voice sounds, not that that has anything to do with anything.

Posted by: Eric at May 19, 2006 10:41 PM

Eric, I can't help but compare some of the discussion over this post, with the discussion you and I had over your response to Jimmy and his 'Dixie Chicks' post at "Sticky Doorknobs" ...

But, returning to this post ... one line of yours really hit home for me ...

"... I'm tempted to ask Todd why he sticks with a church that adheres to such standards ..."

Actually, it's very, very hard to make a break with your church ... to conclude that your church, rather than you, is at fault ...

I speak from first-hand experience ... after much time, and much prayerful consideration, our family finally broke with our church here, in Midland, and transferred our letter to another church of the same denomination, in Midland ...

Eventually, I grew tired of a church that complained about "those people" and, instead, joined a church that served those people ...

The change was especially hard because I was an Elder and - as I saw it - my departure also meant breaking the vows I had taken when becoming an elder ... (SIDENOTE: God bless a dear friend from First Prez-Fort Stockton, where we used to live. He counseled me through my decision, reminded me that I was an Elder for life and that the vow I had taken was not to a particular congregation - but to Christ and his Church.)

Posted by: Jeff at May 20, 2006 01:32 PM

Actually, it's very, very hard to make a break with your church ... to conclude that your church, rather than you, is at fault ...

While I've never had to do this, I can imagine how difficult and painful a decision like this would be. Thanks for sharing your experience.

Posted by: Eric at May 20, 2006 02:16 PM

As far as Tod Agnew's reference to teh "Stained glass crowd" I think I can see where he is coming from. I'm sure there are people who go to church "just for the sake of going" they do it for social status or peer pressure. They do it cause all their friends do. They dress to the hilt and look important but ask them on Monday what the service was about and they wont know (or could think it was about themselves.. JK... Actually I'm sure there are people like that. I KNOW THEM! I am not catholic, but i have many catholic friends who tell me that they do not go to church for any other reason but to keep in with all the friends they have there. And because their kids go to school there. Also, many of my non-catholic christian friends will admit the same thing.. to me thats what it means to be in the 'stained glass crowd'.. And that just goes to show you of our different iterpretations of the song lyrics. wouldnt it be great to hear Tod explain that line in person!?

Posted by: Jeff at May 24, 2006 10:34 PM

Jeff, I have no reason to dispute your interpretation, and, really, that wasn't the point of my post to begin with. My point was more that hypocrisy is no more or less a sin than those things that we might deem as "worse sins" in our human way of keeping score. But the truth is, even the "least" of those sins would be enough to keep us out of heaven were it not for the redeeming grace of God poured out on us through Jesus Christ.

And so I just can't accept Todd's apparent implication that Jesus would rather hang out with one kind of sinner than another. That might work for us humans, but not for the One Who died for both.

Anyway, I appreciate your taking time to share your thoughts.

Posted by: Eric at May 24, 2006 10:46 PM

It might be a sin like any other sin, but Jesus preached about wealth greatly.
Matthew 19:24
"Again I say to you, it is easier for a came1 to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

He tells us again and again that you cannot have wealth and not take care of the poor and be a follower of Him. He repeatedly tells us that money becomes a God, which breaks the commandment to not worship any other God.

I believe this song is about how the "stained glass crowd" spends more money on building beautiful buildings with stained glass and beautiful carpet than taking care of the poor and needy.

Review Matthew 25:31-46 (It's a lot, I'll just highlight the main idea)
"Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it unto me."

He does identify himself with the hungry, sick, and imprisoned. He clearly tells us that we must give up our life and take care of these.
Of course, that's just my opinion, but it is taken from Scripture.

Posted by: Angela at May 28, 2006 09:29 PM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?