It wasn't Big Oil's fault, after all...

Here's a story you won't likely see in most mainstream media: the recent sharp drops in crude oil prices, along with some other rather obscure -- but not invisible -- data make a strong case for the fact that it wasn't the oil companies responsible for the run-up in prices via withholding of supply, but, instead, speculators and commodities investors. From today's Wall Street Journal's MarketBeat blog:

Oil ended trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange at $55.59 a barrel, down $2.73 on the session, after losing another $2.73 Wednesday. Darin Newsom, senior commodities analyst at DTN in Omaha, Neb., says the decline points to a condition that existed for most of 2005 and 2006 — that of the later-dated futures contracts costing more than the current futures contracts, which suggests the market is flush with supply.

This condition, known as “contango,” means refiners and other market participants are buying and holding oil to sell it down the road, and that they’re not worried about current supply. It means it wasn’t the oil industry driving crude higher — it was investors and speculators, who are now selling. This lines up with data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which shows that while non-commercial traders (funds and other investors) held long positions in oil all throughout 2006, commercial traders — people actually involved in the industry — have been short on a weekly basis going back to May 2005. “It was a house of cards — there’s a huge amount of investment money in it,” Mr. Newsom says.

The idea that speculators have a significant impact on oil prices has long been put forth by the industry, but the issue is seemingly too complicated -- and the industry viewed with too much skepticism -- for the general public to give it any credence. I don't think these new developments will change that. Companies like ExxonMobil and BP are simply too attractive as a target for blame.

[Wikipedia has a fairly concise explanation of the circumstances that give rise to contango, and the opposite state, backwardation, which typically exists when a commodity is in short supply. I doubt that most of you will be interested. Unfortunately.]

Comments

Interesting, I thought the contango was something you and YLB do at your dance class.

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2007 10:47 AM

Yeah, that's understandable. Many people are confused about what we're doing on the dance floor.

Posted by: Eric at January 5, 2007 11:01 AM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?