Design Suggestions for Bloggers: Comments

It's been a while since I tackled the issue of blog usability, not because it's less relevant today than it was back in '03 when I first dived into it with a post about why people should care about their blogs' designs, but primarily because of other distractions. However, I've started seeing more of a particular kind of thing occurring -- something that is probably overlooked by most people -- and that's the placement of the comments link preceding a post rather than following it.

I realize that most people don't obsess over their blog's template. They've picked a template that works for them and one of their criterion is that they don't have to obsess over it. But that doesn't mean that the template's designer kept the blog reader at the top of his or her thoughts when the layout was created.

If you've chosen to enable comments on your blog, presumably you've done so because you enjoy the conversation...the dialog. If you apply a conversational metaphor to the post/comment process, when you place the comment link at the beginning of the post, it's as if you're soliciting the other side of the conversation before it's begun. That's not very logical, even if it might yield more entertaining results, depending on the nature of your readership.

From a practical perspective, when the comments link precedes the post, the reader may have to scroll back up after reading the post in order to reply to it. Granted, we all can use more scrolling practice, but there are more appropriate places to implement it.

My advice is simple: if you know how to edit your blog's template, move the comment link to the bottom of the post. Everything else -- the tags, categories, date stamp, etc. -- can stay at the top, but dropping that link to the bottom will make it easier for conversations to take place.

Related to this is the odd practice of showing comments with the most recent one at the top. This works if the comment window opens by default at the bottom of the thread, but that's hardly ever the case.

Once again, this practice hardly seems logical if comments are viewed as conversations. You're requiring your readers to follow the conversation in reverse order, which is fine for those who think Memento was the best movie ever made, but that's probably a small and finite population, and quite possibly comprised of many non-blog-readers.

[You may be thinking at this point, (1) "Dude, get a life!" and (b) "Well, if that's the case, why are blog posts listed in reverse chronological order?" My responses are (a) Good point, and (2) The posts themselves aren't conversations. Besides, most blogs are set up so that the older posts drop off the home page; you don't have that problem with comments.]

Last, and probably least, please consider enabling at least month and day for the timestamp on comments. Enabling only the time of day prevents your readers from knowing if they're entering a thread in a timely fashion, or if everyone long ago moved on to something else.

In the end, if you have a blog, it doesn't really matter what I think. OK, it doesn't matter what I think whether you have a blog or not, but you know what I mean. But as I wrote in 2003, you're blogging presumably in order to attract and retain readers, and anything you can do to make it easier for readers to participate is likely a good thing. I simply want you to have good things; that's just the kind of guy I am.

That, and a bit OCD.

Technorati tag:

Comments

No, you're not OCD (unless I am and don't know it. ;)) Good suggestions all.

Posted by: Stephen Shores at January 10, 2007 01:54 PM

Stephen, thanks for the affirmation.

Did you know that when you use an ASCII smiley face at the end of a parenthetical phrase, you can omit the closing parenthesis, letting the "smile" do double duty? Did you? Huh? Huh?

[Note: That's how you can tell if you're OCD. ;-]

Posted by: Eric at January 10, 2007 02:09 PM

All good suggestions, and now I know for sure that I am OCD because I have actually thought about all of those things. I even get a little miffed when I assume the mouth will serve double duty only to find an actual smiley face in place of the ASCII smiley face and no closing parenthese. ;-)

Posted by: Gwynne at January 10, 2007 04:29 PM

...only to find an actual smiley face in place of the ASCII smiley face...

Oh, yeah! I know that feeling. They need to post warning labels or something: "NOTE: Mouths on ASCII smiley faces are not permitted to also serve as closing parentheses on this blog." It's the right way to handle this pressing issue.

Posted by: Eric at January 10, 2007 04:36 PM

I concur with all of your points, particularly with the point about letting the date appear in the comment timestamp. The time-only thing seems to be some sort of default behavior in Blogger.

Posted by: Michael Bates at January 10, 2007 04:38 PM

8-{)

Posted by: Jim at January 10, 2007 05:53 PM

Michael, I think you're right about the default behavior in Blogger, but I've also seen it on other platforms. It's an easy detail to overlook.

Posted by: Eric at January 10, 2007 05:53 PM

How funny that you decided to elaborate on such subjects today - just last night, I myself commented on the wrong posting on Jimmy's blog...I knew I should have been sleeping!!

His comments link is posted at the bottom, I was just catching up on reading, and scrolled up too far.

So, in the case of moi, I can mess up anything!

Posted by: Janie at January 10, 2007 05:55 PM

I'm with you. I hate trying to figure out what goes where.

I found one recently that does comments both ways at once: if you reply to a comment, your reply goes below that comment. If you post a new comment, yours goes at the top. And the "comment" link is at the bottom of the page (below the *oldest* comment on the page, and there may be multiple pages of comments.)

OCD gets a bad rap. It's something to strive for, not to shun.

Posted by: Brian at January 10, 2007 05:58 PM

I personally find it easier when the link is at the bottom especially when it's a long post :). Guess I'm lazy hehe :P.

Posted by: Rachel at January 10, 2007 07:02 PM

Janie, that happens to all of us sooner of later. I've done it myself.

Brian, you must be an IT professional. ;-)

Rachel, you're not lazy...just a good steward of your time and resources!

Posted by: Eric at January 10, 2007 08:12 PM

You may be thinking at this point, (1) "Dude, get a life!"

Erm... maybe I'm OCD too, because I was just thinking that you were making some very valid and well-reasoned points. Then again, I find web design fascinating.

Posted by: Foo at January 11, 2007 12:09 PM

Good points, Eric. I've been obsessing over the details of my template a great deal lately. Site still seems a little slow to load, but it's a vast improvment over the old frames-based setup that had been in place until Jan. 1st.

Posted by: Rob O. at January 15, 2007 08:53 PM

Rob, I like your new layout. I've rarely encountered any non-framed layout that wasn't an improvement over its framed counterpart. ;-)

Posted by: Eric at January 16, 2007 10:20 AM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?