Putting a speed bump on new Texas tollroads
The Texas Insider reports that a Houston state representative has co-authored a bill that puts a two year hold on the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) and allows the legislature to study the way the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) handles all toll roads.
The report says that Dwayne Bohac has some of the same concerns that a bunch of ordinary Texas citizens have about the state's plans to grab a huge swath of land through the central part of the state on which a toll road would be built and operated by a Mexican company:
"There are a lot of details about the toll roads that are just now coming to light and frankly some of them are disturbing," Bohac said. "I don't think that the state of Texas should be in the business of taking farm and ranch land by eminent domain so that a foreign company can make money off of our taxpayers."
I'll confess that when I first encountered the arm-waving over the plans for the TTC, I chalked it up to the usual flat-earth backlash against anything that smacks of progress. But the more I learn of the project, the more odious it seems, and I applaud the move to slow things down in order to get full disclosure on the table.
If you want to track the flipside of the coin as shown on the TTC site linked above, visit CorridorWatch (which sports the world's longest home page). One key difference between the two sites that's more telling than one might initially realize: the TTC site is also provided in Spanish.
Technorati tag: Trans-Texas Corridor
Michael, I had really planned to stay on the sidelines for this one since I don't have a dog in the [direct] fight, but there's just so much that seems to be wrong with this project that it's hard to keep quiet.
But, I'm still far from being completely educated on the issues. I need to do some more homework, which I suspect will confirm what is now more or less a gut feeling.
Posted by: Eric at March 20, 2007 09:21 PMI come at it from the laissez faire angle, and even ignoring the rather fragrant nature of the deal, my bigger problem with it is that I don't see the problem this corridor is solving.
Credit to the powers that were for some long-range thinking, but it's becoming clear that it was just a smokescreen for the third oldest profession, spreading other people's money around to your friends.
Posted by: Bret at March 21, 2007 08:02 AMPraise the Lord. I knew I smelled something, but I was trying to ignore it, hoping MLB would take her turn scooping the litter box.
I like you guys, so I won't even start on the debacle that is the 121 project.
Posted by: Foo at March 21, 2007 08:35 AMWhy have a mexican company run this? What's wrong with keeping American money in America? Yeah, it's typical Texas politics, using your power as an elected official to line the pockets of fellow cronies who I am sure return the favor. I avoid Oklahoma when I travel because of their toll roads. The interstate works quite well.
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2007 10:39 AMThe West Texas effects of the corridor project would be less invasive than in other parts of the state, though people and current businesses in Fort Stockton, Ozona and Sonora would have problems, since the only proposed route through the region would mirror Interstate 10, but bypass the cities along the route currently served by the highway by as much as 5-10 miles (and limited access toll highway with on-route services, such as with the toll roads in the northeast and midwest, do considerably take business away from towns near the road, though restaurants and service stations would feel the effect more than motels. People just don't like exiting and entering through toll plazas just to eat or fuel up if they don't have to, and the state reaps rental $$$ for the rights to the on-highway service areas, so it's also in their interest to keep people from leaving the road).
There is no planned corridor route at this time mirroring I-20, from Dallas-Fort Worth to El Paso, even though traffic volume there is heavier than along I-10, and odds are the I-10 replacement corridor is dead last on the list of projects in the hopper. So if you're Starbucks at the Rankin Highway or the Pilot Truck Stop at West County Road, you don't have to worry about your new locations becoming obsolete any time soon.
Posted by: John at March 21, 2007 12:46 PM
Eric, I'm glad to see you writing about this. I had much the same initial reaction as you, but it changed as I started looking at the 121 and 130 toll road deals in Texas with Cintra. (I was doing research for a column about a bill in the Oklahoma legislature affecting similar deals here.) That non-compete clause is especially odious.
Posted by: Michael Bates at March 20, 2007 05:20 PM