Client: "Send me bigger bills that I can ignore"
You know, you really should raise your rates a bit. You are selling yourself way short for the services you are performing.
Quick quiz. The source of the preceding statement is:
As a punchline in the "Big Book of Freelance Website Design Jokes"
That hazy world of early morning REM sleep just before the alarm ruins a perfectly fine dream
An actual client email in response to receipt of a bill for website maintenance.
If you chose the third option, you're obviously delusional -- but you're also correct.
I responded to this amazing observation...
Thanks for your concern about my fees. However, you may be overestimating the time it takes to perform a lot of the maintenance work that I do. The updates you requested below, for example, took all of two minutes to complete. Even if I raised my rates 50% that would still work out to a whopping $2.
I've seen folks do thirty minutes worth of work and charge $100 just because the client couldn't do the work for himself, and while he may be willing to pay, I have a hard time believing that any webwork is worth $200 an hour.
But my client wasn't finished...
Hey, remember it's your expertise that matters, not just the amount of time you spend. Our doctors can do a cataract surgery in 4 minutes, but patients pay because they're the best! I still think you should raise your rates.
I've said all along that web design isn't brain surgery; maybe I'm using the wrong medical comparison. Plus, I thought we were paying for malpractice insurance, not expertise.
What's the point of sharing this? Only that I had to send a second notice a month later. I guess my first invoice was too small to take seriously.*
*In the client's defense, I learned that family business had intervened shortly after my invoice arrived, and it got lost in the shuffle. I understand completely. I simply found the whole situation amusing and ironic.
So web design is more like cataract surgery then? ;-)
Posted by: Gwynne at April 4, 2007 10:36 AMOne time, there was a lawyer who's client came in with a big problem. The lawyer told him, "Calm down. I can probably get this cleared up with just a letter." The lawyer sends the letter, and the client is thrilled. A giant lawsuit has been averted with a single letter.
Then the client gets a bill for $5000. He's furious. "How can you send me a bill for $5000 for just writing a letter?"
The lawyer says, "I see your point; I'll send you a revised invoice." The invoice arrives two days later, and says:
- One Letter: $5
- Knowing what to say in the letter: $4995
One Letter: $5
Knowing what to say in the letter: $4995
That right there was worth the price of admission! I've got another round of billing coming up. I might just try this on for size. ;-)
Rob, it's probably nothing that Adam Smith would recognize. "Golden Rule Economics" perhaps? ;-)
Gwynne, I guess it's better than comparing it to a hemorrhoidectomy!
Phelps, there's no question that paying for expertise is a fundamental in a free economy, in everything from haircuts to bridge building to brain surgery. The complications arise in determining what's a fair and reasonable rate for such charges, if, indeed, "fair and reasonable" are valid criteria. Some might argue that they aren't.
Posted by: Eric at April 4, 2007 12:20 PMOne letter: $5
Knowing which mailbox to put it in: $4995.
That kind of economics would suit me fine.
Posted by: Jim at April 4, 2007 04:57 PMGood one, Jim. ;-) Of course, I don't send much mail so the increase in the price of postage might not bother me as much as my mother.
Posted by: Gwynne at April 4, 2007 05:42 PM
We need more service providers like you, and more customers like your client. (What kind of economics _is_ that?)
Posted by: Rob at April 4, 2007 09:26 AM