"Dancing With the Stars": Handicapping the Field
Note: The following post may seem to edge dangerously close to obsessive. So be it. At least I'm not writing about something truly trivial, like, say, baseball.
We're a couple of weeks into ABC's Dancing With the Stars and it's time for me to weigh in with my observations and predictions. With almost two years of ballroom lessons under my belt, I feel I'm well qualified to recognize bad dancing when I see it, because I've seen a lot of it -- primarily on the videos of our lessons.
Two contestants have been voted off the show: alleged supermodel Paulina Poriskova and the wearyingly bubbly game show hostess, Shandi Finnessey. The fact that the shambling Clyde Drexler and the soporific Billy Ray Cyrus are still in the competition proves my pet theory about the show: it's a man's contest. Or, put another way, the female viewership vote is such that a woman will have to clearly outshine all male competitors to win. There's only one woman in this year's cast with the potential for doing that.
Here's my seeding for the next nine weeks of DWTS, from bottom to top (and please note that these are my predictions, not my preferences):
- Clyde "The Glide" Drexler -- Clyde's no Emmitt Smith, and while the voters offset some of the harshest words from the judges we've heard to date, his fan base won't keep him on the court, uh, dance floor another week.
- Leeza Gibbons -- Placing a [non-permanent] "Tramp" tattoo above her left breast in order to channel her inner rebel may have come across as saucy and edgy to some, but my general reaction was more akin to ewwww. She's a better dancer than the next two guys, but not good enough to overcome the gender gap.
- Billy Ray Cyrus -- Billy Ray continues to do penance [all the way to the bank] for the unpardonable sin of performing a country song with mass commercial appeal, and because of that, I'd be happy to see him continue. But he's the Master P of this year's competition, and doesn't exhibit enough charisma to counter his lack of footwork.
- John Ratzenberger -- The likable Cheers star is the token AARP rep, ala Jerry Springer last year and George Hamilton before that. He'll get some slack cut for old times' sake, and he's got the acting ability to sell the choreography, but the legs just aren't there to keep him in the show.
- Heather Mills -- Heather has been a pleasant surprise to me, not for her dancing as much as for the way she seems to be truly enjoying the experience. She's more likable than I expected. Her partner is doing an amazing job of choreographing steps that minimize the impact of her prosthetic leg, using basic misdirection to allow a cooperative audience to happily ignore one unfortunate fact: she's just not that good as a dancer. And, despite assurances to the contrary at the beginning, it's difficult to believe that she's being judged with the same criteria as the top competitors. Nevertheless, her example is truly inspirational and a fifth place showing will be a non-trivial accomplishment.
- Laila Ali -- Laila is, as everyone knows, Muhammed Ali's daughter, and a world champion boxer. She has her dad's moves, athleticism, and charisma -- but she's also got his mercurial temperament, and does not appear to suffer fools or losing lightly. That intensity works for her in the ring, but not so much in the eyes of the voting audience. If she'll soften her demeanor a bit, and loosen up on the floor, she could do better than I predict; she's got the talent to pull it off. Her main disadvantage is that she's a woman, and she'll have a hard time disguising that with choreography. [Now, here's the probably controversial sleeper factor: she's got that "Jennifer Hudson" build, and I'm sure there's a sizable segment of the female voters who can relate to and pull for her more than for some of her preternaturally skinny competitors.]
- Ian Ziering -- I'd never heard of Ian before this show, and the fact that his name is pronounced "eye-ann" doesn't help his cause. But if this was just about the dancing, Ian would win, hands-down. He's likable, self-effacing, charming, and has the best moves. How can I say that? He's the only competitor whose minor mistake in the last dance was obvious enough to be (1) pointed out by the judges, (2) spotlighted on the show, and (3) recognized as it occurred by me. And how, you ask, does such an obvious mistake illustrate his superiority? Fair question, and it's simply because all the others had performances that were uniformly lackluster, such that their mistakes got lost in the shuffle. Unfortunately for Ian, this is not all about the dancing. [Wild card: Ian's paired with Cheryl Burke, who's won this contest twice in a row.]
- Apolo Anton Ohno -- The Olympic gold medal speed skater is a fine athlete, and his sport's required skills -- balance and quick feet -- translate directly to the dance floor. His personality is more endearing than the somber focused shots from the Olympics would indicate. He's also drawn the perfect partner, first-time DWTSer Julianne Hough, whose youth and energy match well with Ohno's. Whether he can channel his athleticism into the necessary controlled precision remains to be seen, but the pair certainly can captivate when they're "on." I sense huge voter support from the under-21 crowd.
- Joey Fatone -- Despite having, to paraphrase British judge Len Goodman, a "bum that sticks out there," former boy band member Fatone has the stage training and presence to win the whole thing. It's hard to figure out why he's allowed to compete with untrained dancers; just because he's never danced a traditional tango, for instance, doesn't make him any less a trained hoofer. You think that tight choreography displayed by NSYNC doesn't carry over to ballroom? Guess again. Anyway, next to Ian, he's got the best moves, and his fan base is off the chart. And it's not hurting him that he's paired with the stunning Aussie, Kym Johnson, who paid her dues last season as Jerry Springer's partner (and carried him to a much undeserved fifth place).
Now, given my woeful performance predicting outcomes in the NCAA men's basketball tournament, I wouldn't advise mortgaging the house to lay a big bet on any of the preceding prognostications.
I'm not missing a ton by not watching.
Well, obviously the show's not for everyone, but my intent with this post was not to express dissatisfaction with it. In fact, it's more enjoyable than ever, from our perspective, especially as we learn firsthand the challenges of getting more skilled at dancing. Different strokes and all that, I guess.
Posted by: Eric at April 5, 2007 07:05 AMEvery time I watch Billy Ray Cyrus dance, I have flashbacks to the "Ted Mack Amateur Hour."
The Mr. suggested the other night, that the untrained females might have an advantage over the untrained males ... meaning the untrained males would have the double burden of learning to dance and learning to lead at the same time. But it isn't working out that way.
Does something so highly choreographed mean that no one is really leading?
Posted by: Deborah at April 5, 2007 08:43 AMDeborah, you can be sure that the pro is doing the leading in every case -- male and female. It's sort of comical watching the professional women trying to keep their partners' right arms up in the proper level and framed position, an almost impossible task given that the lady's arm is on top of the man's.
Still, the guys *should* have a harder time because they're supposed to at least *look* like they're in control. In many cases, that just means standing in one place with a stern look while the woman gyrates madly about them, ala John Ratzenberger.
Posted by: Eric at April 5, 2007 09:00 AMWell done, Eric. There's really not much that I could add to your evaluations, even if I'd taken the time to try and articulate my impressions of the individual dancers.
I'm no ballroom dancer, but I've always had the impression when watching real ballroom dancing competitions that it's not really about the guy. Sure, he leads, but he's mostly there as a prop for the woman. If one accepts that premise, then Laila Ali is at a distinct disadvantage. As the woman and the inexperienced partner, she really has got to go above and beyond to be perceived as being as good as the male stars, who have the benefit of having professionals as the focus of their pairings.
I don't know about you, but when the lady pros are flashing thighs and cleavage and lithe catlike moves all over the place, it's pretty easy to miss the fact that the men are stepping all over their... erm... themselves.
That said, the chemistry and ability of your first two seeds is undeniable. As I've mentioned in a previous comment, I was a fan of Kym Johnson's perky enthusiasm last year, and I like Pantone's self-effacing humor. But I've been impressed with how quickly The Kids (Hough and Ohno) have clicked as a team--they practically glow--and how quick a study Ohno seems to be. He seemed a bit awkward in the first couple weeks, but he seems to be into it now and has a real elegance about him when he dances. If he continues to improve at this rate, I believe he and Hough will knock Johnson and Pantone out of the box and could be this year's winners.
I sure would like to see Ali win, though. Just to show that the competition's not fatally skewed toward the men.
Posted by: Foo at April 6, 2007 09:03 AMFoo, your observations about the respective roles of women and men in ballroom dancing are correct. The role of the man is to make the woman look good -- the focus should be on the woman. However, I don't believe that that's why Ali and the other women are at a disadvantage in this competition.
If this was simply a judged competition, the judges wouldn't be (and aren't) fooled by the moves designed to divert attention from the clumsiness of the amateurs. However, as in American Idol (I guess; I don't watch it), the "voting viewers" can override the judges' professional pronouncements, and I'm of the opinion that a lot more women are voting than men. And, face it -- Ohno could fall on his face every night and he would still capture more of the female vote than, say, Leeza Gibbons.
Posted by: Eric at April 8, 2007 07:18 PMI watched a little bit last time around. Someone pointed out that Emmitt's partner was the partner of the guy who won the first time. Does that come into play at all?
Posted by: soccer dad at April 11, 2007 01:06 PMThe professional partners definitely play a big role in the amateurs' chances of success. They do the choreography, for one thing, which can camouflage weaknesses and play up strengths. They also lead -- even if they're female (see some of the preceding discussion for more about that). Cheryl Burke, Emmitt's partner last year and also on the winning team the year before, obviously knows what it takes to win the judges' votes. Whether she can attract the viewers' votes is another matter.
Posted by: Eric at April 11, 2007 01:18 PMSo who's Cheryl's partner this year?
(p.s. my wife and daughter thought that Mario should have won last year. I bet it was those Cowboys fans that made the difference.)
She's partnered with Ian Ziering, who apparently was on "90210." I never watched it so I wouldn't know. He's a pretty good dancer, though.
I bet it was those Cowboys fans that made the difference.
Gee, ya think? ;-)
Posted by: Eric at April 11, 2007 02:23 PMWhoops, sorry, I missed that you wrote that as a "wild card" at the end. I'm wondering if she's not the wildcard, but the real star.
Posted by: soccer dad at April 11, 2007 02:35 PM
Your issue with Joey is the same that was applied to Drew Lachey and Stacey Keebler...last season? Season before last? It's the last season I watched, whichever it was. Regardless, I enjoyed your summary and, if nothing else, it served to show in my mind at least that I'm not missing a ton by not watching.
Ian Zering...guess we know what generation you're from if that doesn't immediately summon the image of Beverly Hills 90210 :) I never watched it, but I still know who he is, even though the show started my freshman year of college. More recently he was on Hollywood Squares. Yes, I watched that. :)
Posted by: beth at April 5, 2007 06:55 AM