TDF Report: The Ads

I'm having trouble getting motivated to blog about the Tour de France thus far. It's early enough in the race that teams are still riding conservatively, trying more to avoid losing the race than to win it, and that doesn't make for compelling drama. Most of the stages have been like NBA games; you can ignore all but the last two minutes (or two kilometers) and not miss much of anything.

But, one thing that's in stark contrast to previous years is the almost complete absence of previous TDF winners in the advertising. When Lance Armstrong was making his incredible run of consecutive wins, almost every ad featured him in some way. Even last year, when he wasn't in the race, his familiar presence was a common theme for commercials.

This year is different, and one can't help but feel a bit sorry for three entities, the first being Floyd Landis, the second being Óscar Pereiro, and the third being advertisers as a group.

In Floyd's case, the long drawn-out controversy over whether he did or didn't dope up during last year's TDF victory has deprived him not only of being able to compete in this year's race, but also of all the very lucrative endorsement deals that normally accrue to the wearer of the yellow jersey. Now, granted, Landis is nowhere as well-known or charismatic as Armstrong, but he is an American, and even a lesser-known American TDF winner is a valuable asset in the cycling world. Unless, of course, he's damaged goods, and that's the verdict on Landis, regardless of the outcome of the drug hearings. I suspect he's lost close to seven figures in endorsement deals, and those will not reappear even if his victory is legitimized via the appeals process.

Pereiro's situation is a bit different. As the runner-up last year, he shouldn't have expected to play a big role in this year's ad campaigns. But, if he truly was the winner, then he's been cheated out of those deals and, again, they won't reappear.

The third group worthy of sympathy consists of the advertisers who had to make a tough choice about Landis as a spokesman or product endorser. I suspect the decision wasn't that hard in the end. It's better to leave him out of the marketing plans, rather than risk having your guy exposed as a cheater. Again, even if he's proven innocent, the damage has been done, and there's little upside left. What I am a bit surprised about is that Lance wasn't re-recruited to fill in the gap left by the theoretical vacancy in the yellow jersey. Perhaps there just wasn't time to get the campaigns off the ground. And, perhaps that tactic smacked too much of rubbing Landis's face in it, although that might attribute an unwarranted amount of conscience to ad agencies.

OK, there's actually a fourth group to feel sorry for as a result of this situation, and that's all the viewers who now have to watch an endless repetition of Smiling Bob's stiff endorsement of "male enhancement products" and Cervelo bike commercials that look like they were shot by an obscure Swedish film director.

No, I'm afraid we'll have to be content the race itself. Personally, I'm waiting for the Alps.

Technorati tags: | |

Comments

What? You don't like Bob (the man-e-can [sic])? You're a hard man, Eric.

But seriously... I found those ads intensely annoying the first year they ran. The Saab "born from jets" campaign is dated, but comfortingly familiar. I miss the Sköda ads, though. No, wait. Those are only in the EuroSport audio broadcast.

It's obviously starting to run together for me, since I don't have Versus on my cable service and have to watch what I can on live stream I discovered before the web page where I found it was "asked" to remove the link. Predictably, the stream is pretty good until a couple minutes before the finish, at which point someone on our network at work decides to download The World. Or, more likely, Versus' servers can't take the load from all the folks wanting to watch just the last two minutes.

So far, the one truly memorable moment of this year's tour was Cancellara's 3d stage finish. Sweet for the Suisse.

Posted by: Foo at July 13, 2007 07:41 AM

Now, admittedly, I am not paying a ton of attention (read: any) but I vaguely recall seeing a headline somewhere (I did say vaguely) that Armstrong was supportive of/siding with Landis.

If that's the case, then that would indicate one reason why Armstrong's not in the ads. Either the ad cos won't ask him b/c of it or Armstrong said no. Or, Armstrong is happy with the piles of money around his house that he uses for important things like furniture and paper toweling and doesn't see a need for anything more in the immediate future.

Or, the ad cos are as annoyed with Armstrong as at least one person (read: me) for dumping Sheryl Crow when she got cancer because he didn't want to deal with her cancer. Um. Hippocritical much?

Or I have no idea what I'm talking about. (This is an equally valid option to all of the above.)

Posted by: beth at July 13, 2007 08:51 AM

So far, the one truly memorable moment of this year's tour was Cancellara's 3d stage finish.

I'd have to rank his save on yesterday's final descent, when he overshot a curve and flirted with disaster, as a definite high point, similar to when Lance was forced to cut across a field a few years back. Cancellara may just be the real deal. I think we'll know for sure tomorrow.

Seeing Vinokourov and Kloden both crashing hard yesterday also makes me think that the Swiss rider has some of the "luck" needed to win the TDF.

Posted by: Eric at July 13, 2007 08:52 AM

for dumping Sheryl Crow when she got cancer because he didn't want to deal with her cancer.

First I've heard of that.

I figured it was because he finally figured out she's a total head case.

Posted by: Eric at July 13, 2007 08:53 AM

Well, it's possible he figured out she was a total headcase the day after she announced to the world she had cancer. If so, bad timing all around. (Course, he was never super high on my list for the whole dumping his wife and kids for Sheryl Crow thing so...)

Posted by: beth at July 13, 2007 08:56 AM

he was never super high on my list for the whole dumping his wife and kids

Yeah, he dropped way down on my Good Guy list after that.

Did you know that Kristen Armstrong is a now regular contributor to Runner's World Magazine? She writes mainly about how running has helped her cope with these kinds of events. She's a pretty good writer.

Posted by: Eric at July 13, 2007 09:41 AM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?