Random Thursday
Busy day ahead, so let's dive right in, shall we?
- Terrorist Toys - Consider this scenario. It's December, 2001. Government and military leaders in a foreign country have observed how America has been shaken to its core by the 9/11 attacks, and begin considering if there's a way to take advantage of our country's new focus on radical Islamists. The core question: if one has the patience, what's the best long-term strategy for bringing an otherwise potent nation to its knees? Answer: destroy its children. Question: how is that possible? Answer: Booby-trap the toys we export to that country. Think of it as an IED with a really long fuse. Perhaps it's time that the Department of Homeland Security took over policing Chinese imports? (And remember the saying, "just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean that everyone isn't out to get you.")
- Pop Tart Consumption - I think we've been selling Britney Spears short, based on the revelation of her monthly budget in court records associated with her ongoing dispute with K-Fed. We've pegged her as undisciplined and unfocused, but I challenge the Gazette readership to consider if they have the sheer stamina and determination to party each month to the tune of a hundred large, or to spend $16K every 30 days on clothes (which is even more amazing considering that none of that goes for underwear!).
- Shocked, I tell you. Shocked! - Jimmy's dismayed over the lack of civility on the part of certain anonymous blog commenters. This is a subject that probably merits its own post, but here's one thought that springs immediately to my mind. The blogger is responsible for - and has complete control over - what appears on his or her blog. This is a lesson that's sometimes learnt the hard way, as Jimmy discovered last Tuesday evening. The sad fact is that if you're going to post on potentially controversial or emotion-laden topics, you'd better be prepared to exercise strong editorial control of the resulting conversation. Eventually, those who have nothing of value to contribute will head for easier hunting grounds.
- I hate to end on negative notes, so here are a couple of tips. First, for the locals: Burr Williams has posted his list of the best books about the Llano Estacado (primarily encompassing West Texas), fiction and non-fiction. If you're a resident of the area, or just have a love of the region, it's worth using as a guide for building your library. Second, for anyone who likes gumbo but doesn't like going to the trouble to make it from scratch: Look for a jar of Cookwell & Company "Cajun Two-Step Gumbo" (available at H-E-B). Dump it in a pot, add some boiled shrimp or diced chicken, and steam some rice on the side. Add jalapeņo or Tabasco sauce to suit, and enjoy. You'll be amazed, I gar-on-tee.
Have a good 'un!
The gumbo mix wasn't made in China, was it?
If not, I'll be happy to give it a try!
Posted by: Jeff at November 8, 2007 08:55 AMBeth, I understand (sort of) the DHS role in customs supervision, but I was thinking more of the role the Consumer Protection Agency (or whatever it's called) plays. Is that part of the customs process? For example, I find it difficult to believe that customs agents have the knowledge, skill or time to test imported toys for lead paint. And, of course, that's the problem.
Jeff, don't ruin it by putting an image of "Chinese gumbo" in my mind! ;-)
Posted by: Eric at November 8, 2007 09:09 AMAh...I have no idea if that's part of the customs process, but I would think that it is somehow. Then again, if it is, someone is really slipping. Customs agents do open stuff and check for counterfeits/label knock offs etc. though...it doesn't seem too much of a stretch to think they'd be looking for/checking on hazardous stuff too. But I dunno.
Posted by: beth at November 8, 2007 09:29 AMEric, thanks for the mention.
Just to clarify, the circumstances Tuesday on MyWestTexas were a bit different with what we faced in that the disruptive commenters were watching a live Web cast and adding to a quickly scrolling text. Stemming the hemorrhage of off-topic character assassinations would not have been easy during our live Web cast (which, I might add, does not mean that on-topic character assassinations would have been any more preferrable). We will not make that mistake again, and controls will be put in place the next time we host a few of our more dignified souls. (In fact we plan to hang a sign on the front door of the chat room that says "Only decent folks aloud").
This morning, I actually received an email IN DEFENSE OF people making fun of our guests' physical attributes and speech patterns, although the emailer chose to remain anonymous. There's a big Duh! for ya.
There really is no cause for this land mine behavior as I'm sure you would agree, and even if you prepare yourself, you are likely not often prepared for such childish, boorish conduct. In all earnestness, I know you are on top of it and control your blog tightly and you seldom have that problem, at least that's the way it appears.
Sadly, what happened on MyWestTexas Tuesday night is merely a reflection of the greater ills in society. That I-can-do-what-I-want-when-I-want attitude. The I-am-going-to-run-through-this-red-light-because-I-am-lord-of-lords-and-no-one-can-stop-me mentality. Accountability often does not exist in either the real or the virtual world and I was and have been well aware of it long before Tuesday's web cast, trust me. Naive though I am in hoping that decency will prevail, I chose instead to prefer to think people would behave rationally. Silly me.
Civility may not be dead, but its pulse is faint.
Posted by: jimmy at November 8, 2007 12:22 PMJimmy, thanks for the elucidation. I wasn't specifically picking on you, just observing that the sad reality of our society is that we can no longer rely on the civility of our visitors and therefore we have to be prepared to act swiftly to enforce whatever rules we deem important to the discussion. You've apparently climbed up a way on that learning curve.
Things seem in control around the Gazette primarily because I waved a white flag and decided to no longer post about highly charged issues (generally). So, in a way, the boors have won, at least in my case. (Not that the public dialog is in any way hampered by the absence of the Gazette as a forum for such topics.)
Posted by: Eric at November 8, 2007 12:39 PMEric, I know you weren't caling me out, and you are right. Perhaps we should have been more forward thinking about the possibility of pettiness. People are people but fortunately, the majority of the ones who drop by here, Sticky Doorknobs and MyWestTexas, in addition to most every blog I know of out here, are well meaning people. For that at least we can be thankful.
Posted by: jimmy at November 8, 2007 12:43 PM
Technically, DHS is in charge of policing Chinese imports - well, really, all imports. Customs, which is actually part of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) which includes immigration and a whole host of other agencies now - is all part of DHS. Of course, that doesn't mean they do an amazingly wonderful job, but having recently been on a tour of the Baltimore Ports (including both sea and air) "behind the scenes" as it were, they catch a whole heckuva lot of stuff that we never hear about. Imports included.
I can't fathom spending $16K a YEAR on clothing, let alone each month. And while you were surprised none of that seems to encompass undergarments, I was just surprised that clothing that covers so little costs so much. Imagine her budget if she had to buy pants that went up to her waist, skirts that covered her booty, or shirts that actually left something to the imagination.
Mmmm...gumbo. Thanks for the tip - I'll have to see if we have good eatin' in a jar back East.
Posted by: beth at November 8, 2007 08:47 AM