Well, darn. I was starting to take a liking to Mr. Huckabee.

Or it could be a reflection on the crankiness of Judicial Watch.
:-(

That did occur to me, as I know nothing about the organization or what its agenda might encompass.

At least they're bipartisan in their crankiness.

To my surprise, the only surprise in that list is the Mr. Smith-ish liberal, Obama. The real surprise, to me, is that Mitt Romney isn't on the list.

Is it just me or does the description (from Judicial Watch's 'about us') page that reads in part, "conservative, non partisan..." sound a bit odd.

Jim, it's you. ;-)

"Non partisan" means (to me, anyway) that they don't take sides or play favorites with regard to political affiliation. There are conservative Democrats, just as there are liberal Republicans.

Is that a distinction without a difference? I guess you'll have to decide that for yourself.

I'm sure you're right (about it being me). Still, I would be just as quizzical if it read "liberal, non partisan..."

To certain of the political non-saaverati (i.e. me) it sounds strange.

I'm certainly no political savant. I wouldn't have even given this list a second glance -- much less a link -- if it had contained only Democrats, or only Republicans (or only liberals or only conservatives). I'm not interested in pointing the finger at any one group...unless it's politicians as a whole. I'll bet we can find a little common ground there. ;-)