Advice for Beginning Bloggers

LinkVendor offers a free service that most bloggers are likely to find interesting. It's a back-link list generator, meaning that it will compile a list of the websites that are linking to your site. Now, I realize that there are many similar services, but this one is different from most in that it includes more than just clickable links. It also shows those sites that are stealing your bandwidth.

If that sounds harsh, let me explain. Some people have a habit of using images on their sites without actually loading those images onto their web servers. Instead, they link to the images where they currently reside. This means that whenever you visit their site and view that image, the bandwidth associated with the image is actually coming from the image's host server and not the site you're visiting.

This is bad manners at best, and harmful at worst. Depending on the popularity of the "borrowing" site, the owner of the site housing the "borrowed" image could actually incur additional out-of-pocket expense due to increased bandwidth.

I point this out because when I ran the LinkVendor report for the Gazette, I found about half a dozen sites that were doing exactly what I describe above. In some cases, the offense was somewhat mitigated by the fact that the "borrower" included a text link and/or attribution of the image to the Gazette, but in a couple of cases, they just slapped links to my images on their sites, making it look as if they owned them. And one of the offenders was a revenue-generating blog. (It's only fair to note that when I pointed out how little I appreciated what they were doing, they immediately removed the image. I think that falls into the category of "it's better to ask forgiveness than permission.")

If you're a new blogger – or even an experienced one who never thought about this practice – please don't take shortcuts and link to images residing on servers you don't control. (We haven't even touched on the associated copyright issues.)

If you want to use an image that appears on the Gazette on your personal blog, just ask me. 99.9% of the time I'll gladly grant that permission, and I'll bet that most bloggers will do the same.

To do otherwise is bad manners, if not downright theft.

Comments

Cool. I can't check here at work, but I definitely will when I get home.

Posted by: jen at January 16, 2008 04:18 PM

Jen, I probably should have mentioned that while this service lists links that are images pulled from your server, it doesn't identify them as such. You actually have to visit each site to see if that's the case.

Sometimes, you can tell by the link or domain name whether it's a possibility or not, but it's not as straightforward as I made it sound, I'm afraid.

Posted by: Eric at January 16, 2008 04:33 PM

Eric, how would you rate this problem? Does it happen a lot? I've always uploaded images through Blogger, which is so fast and easy ..... the idea of spending the time and effort to link back to someone else's site never occurred to me.

Posted by: Jeff at January 16, 2008 07:30 PM

Jeff, not every blogging platform is as user-friendly as Blogger when it comes to uploading photos. Also, linking to someone else's photo saves your hard disk space.

How big a problem is it? I'd say not very big, unless you're a professional photographer or artist with a large online portfolio of creative images. For us average Joes, it's more of a philosophical issue than a practical one.

Posted by: Eric at January 16, 2008 07:36 PM

I don't know what is worse, sapping bandwidth this way or actually taking the time to copy your images, save them and load them on to another server. I've come across several of mine that have been thieved this way....even one being used on Wikipedia.

Posted by: Wallace at January 16, 2008 10:10 PM

Yeah, and sometimes you don't know whether to be angry or flattered. Probably a combination of both...although undoubtedly more of the former if you make your living via that creativity.

Posted by: Eric at January 16, 2008 10:20 PM

I couldn't get it to work. It cranked for a couple of minutes and never loaded any data. I'm on cable modem, too. Anyone else have this problem?

Posted by: jen at January 17, 2008 05:52 AM

Jen, it might be the time of day. I tried a few different URLs and it took up to 10 minutes to finally generate the list. I don't think it has to do with the speed of your connection, but instead with the laborious (for computers, that is) task of running down all the backlinks. (As far as my understanding of that process, it's the same as magic to me.)

Posted by: Eric at January 17, 2008 06:33 AM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?