Meet the new bosses, same as the old bosses

The Wall Street Journal published an editorial addressing the sad state of the US energy situation.

The sudden sharp rise in the demand for gasoline, plus the decline in gasoline stocks ... all this adds up, in the minds of some Washington politicos, to a great gasoline conspiracy.

The editorial goes on to describe how two Democratic Senators, both of whom want to be president, are calling for Congressional investigations to discover the causes, which, of course, they've already decided are directly related to oil company manipulation and economic deception.

[One says], "Clearly the oil companies have manufactured a shortage." [The other says] this is "a classic study in the power of the major oil companies to reverse the normal rules of supply and demand."

Of course, the Wall Street Journal isn't buying it, and devotes the rest of the article to showing how all significant disruptions to the desired balance between supply and demand can be laid in large part at the feet of federal agencies and the shortsidedness of Congress itself.

The great gasoline conspiracy was unwittingly concocted on Capitol Hill.

OK, none of this constitutes new news, so why bring it up? The answer is that the editorial in question was published in July, 1975, thirty-three years ago*.

At that time, the senators in question were Adlai Stevenson and Henry "Scoop" Jackson. The supply and demand snafus were introduced by meddling rules promulgated by the FEA – the Federal Energy Administration (which set the bar for incompetence by a government agency with its performance during the Seventies).

Three-plus decades later, we (as in "Congress"; forgive me for implying that you are lumped in with that sad group) still haven't learned the lesson laid out quite clearly in the article:

But by now, we should be learning that the next regulation will only do something else, that the oil industry cannot be run from Washington ... that the way to have the oil industry produce gasoline most efficiently, which is to say at the lowest price, is for the government to get out of its way.

In this case, the Journal was focusing specifically on the refining and distribution of gasoline, but the principles continue to be as relevant as they are ignored.

*I'd publish a link, but this editorial predates the World Wide Web by almost fifteen years. I found it in my "personal professional archives" (aka, "that big pile of junk that I keep transferring moving from one pile to another"). I have no idea why I decided that it was something I needed to keep; I'm pretty sure I never envisioned the concept of blogging back then.

Comments

Unfortunately this isn't surprising although it is a little shocking.

Like watching a train wreck in dejavu?

Posted by: Damien Franco at July 22, 2008 08:51 AM

Whoever came up with the observation that history repeats itself certainly knew what they were talking about.

Don't get me started on the windfall profits tax issue.

Posted by: Eric at July 22, 2008 11:20 AM

Eric, there may be a conspiracy afoot somewhere ... but I'm sure two oil company professionals we know are not involved in the least ;-)

Posted by: Jeff at July 23, 2008 03:29 PM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?