Fleeting Expletives & Old-Fashioned Delicacies

The Supreme Court is considering whether the FCC has the legal right to fine broadcasters whenever someone throws a "fleeting expletive" into the airwaves. The expectation is that the Court will agree with broadcasters that an occasional curse word – even the granddaddy of them all – won't irreparably harm watchers provided they're used only as "intensifiers." I'll let the reader work out the various possibilities and nuances of such a ruling.

I've been re-reading Ernest Hemingway's For Whom The Bell Tolls, as a part of my "Rediscovering Our Personal Library" project. Apart from once more experiencing Hemingway's wonderful storytelling abilities, and in light of today's debate about what constitutes obscene or vulgar language, I'm struck by the delicate way Hemingway manages to achieve the "intensifier" effect without ever using the actual words. I'm sure you recall his technique:

"What are you doing now, you lazy drunken obscene unsayable son of an unnameable unmarried gypsy obscenity?"
"That we blow up an obscene bridge and then have to obscenely well obscenity ourselves off out of these mountains?"
"Go to the unprintable," Agustín said. "And unprint thyself."

And, finally, this exchange:

"Where the un-nameable is this vileness that I am to guard.?"

"In the cave," Pilar said. "In two sacks. And I am tired of thy obscenity."

"I obscenity in the milk of thy tiredness," Agustín said.

"Then go and befoul thyself," Pilar said to him without heat.

"Thy mother," Agustín replied.

Now, I contend that Hemingway did just as good a job – if not better – of conveying emotion, while allowing the reader to supply whichever expletives work best for his or her sensibilities, as today's rock star dropping the F-bomb on live TV (or the Hollywood screenwriter who uses that same word as a crutch to compensate for a lack of skill).

Hitchcock was a brilliant director of suspense films because of what he didn't show on screen. Hemingway respected his readers enough to trust them to fill in their own blanks in his dialogs. Our modern "sophisticated" society could learn some lessons from their practices.

Comments

I haven't actually read any Hemmingway...now I want to. I agree that some things are really best left to the imagination - they're more potent that way. I had a high school teacher who always used to say that people swore because they were too lazy to develop a vocabulary. :)

Posted by: beth at November 5, 2008 03:40 PM

For me, Hemingway is not rapture-inducing, but everyone should read at least one of his books. There are only about fifty to choose from. ;-)

Posted by: Eric at November 5, 2008 04:02 PM

I see nothing wrong with using an obscenity occasionally - but only if the occasion calls for it.

Like stubbing my toe in dark. I'll try to remember to say "oh, befoul!" next time I do that. :-)

Posted by: Donna B. at November 5, 2008 05:20 PM

Stubbing your toe in the dark certainly could be cause for using obscenities.

Or perhaps dropping a novel written by Hemmingway on your toe in the dark? Foul...

Posted by: Damien Franco at November 5, 2008 05:39 PM

Hmm...now I rethink my previous thought. Is he more torturous or less than, say, Faulkner?

I know many of the titles of his stuff, just not what they're about - which is what enabled me to answer "A Farewell To Arms" on a Trivial Pursuit question regarding the name of a Hemingway novel about a man injured in WWI. People were not appreciative of my pun....but I'd hoped you might be.

Posted by: beth at November 5, 2008 07:37 PM

Is he more torturous or less than, say, Faulkner?

Oh, much less. Hemingway's prose is, for the most part, sparse and powerful. If Faulkner is a scalpel, Hemingway is a double-bit ax. But both of them are better at metaphors than that.

Funny story about "A Farewell to Arms." It was only thanks to an perceptive editor that Hemingway's novel proved to be a commercial success, as that editor pointed out - and correctly, I think - that the original title, "A Farewell to Pinkies," lacked sufficient drama. The rest, as they say, is history. ;-)

Posted by: Eric at November 5, 2008 08:42 PM

I've not read much (any?) Hemingway either, mostly because I had a radical feminist English Lit professor who taught that he was evil. From the above, I would have to disagree. So much for a fair and balanced education.

That said, my favorite use of the F-bomb in broadcasting was on CNN, during the 2004 Democratic Convention, when the balloons dropped (or didn't, which resulted in the very unexpected and unintended expletive hitting the airwaves). Hilarious. And I do hope CNN was fined.

Posted by: gwynne at November 6, 2008 10:22 AM

May I say that any editor who would say that "A Farewell to Pinkies" lacked drama had never shut her finger in a car door?

It should also be noted that I could be a professional klutz were there ever any call for one.

Posted by: Donna B. at November 6, 2008 11:13 PM

I could be a professional klutz were there ever any call for one.

Well, someone has to take Chevy Chase's place, right?

Gwynne, I haven't read everything Hemingway has written, and he was definitely a "man's man," (in the traditional sense of the term) but he also created female characters that are powerful and nuanced. But your observation about your college education does underscore the importance of what I think is the single most neglected skill in young people (and not-so-young): the desire and ability to think critically. Educators who see their duty as saturating the sponges of young minds instead of converting those minds to intelligent filtering devices do them and society a disservice. (Wow...how did I get off on that?)

Posted by: Eric at November 7, 2008 08:24 AM
Post a comment [Take your time...we're in no hurry.]









Remember personal info?